Archive for February, 2012

February 27, 2012

Why Nothing Matters: A Talk By Ronald Green

by Alan B.

Our next meeting takes place on Friday 2nd March, at Blackrock Castle Observatory, starting at 8.00pm. The talk is by author Ronald Green, and promises to be a very interesting discussion all about…nothing!

Why should nothing matter? If anything matters, why should nothing matter? And yet it does, for there isn’t anything, it seems, that nothing does not touch, or anything that does not touch nothing. History, philosophy, religion, science, art, literature, music – all look towards nothing at some point, stimulating questions that would otherwise not be asked.

Who, for example, could have believed that nothing held back progress for 600 years in the Middle Ages, all because of mistaken translation, or that nothing is a way to tackle (and answer) the perennial question “what is art?”? Ronald Green uses nothing in a genuine attempt to look at the world in a different way, to give new angles to old problems and so to stimulate new thoughts.

What is this nothing, that we can’t actually see, touch or feel? Is it absolute? Is it relative to everything else? If we are able to think about it, write and read about it, is it something, and if so wouldn’t it then not be nothing?

This is precisely the mystery of nothing – that the more we think about it, the more there is to it.

Disarmingly invisible, the point of nothing – to paraphrase Bertrand Russell on philosophy – is to start with something so simple as to seem not worth examining, and to end with something so paradoxical that no one will believe it.

About The Speaker: Ronald Green is the author of “Nothing Matters – a book about nothing” (iff-Books). Philosopher, linguist, university lecturer and ESL teacher, with 13 ESL books published, Ronald has lectured and given workshops in Europe, North and South America and the Middle East on linguistics, ESL and the use of the Internet in education. His short stories have been published in Nuvein magazine, Tryst, Aesthetica, the Sink and Unholy Biscuit. He has completed a philosophical novel and co-authored a psychological thriller with strong philosophical underpinnings. For the past five years he has been thinking seriously about nothing, culminating in his recently-published book.

This talk is open to the public, and is free to attend. Directions to Blackrock Castle Observatory can be found on our information page. We hope to see you there!

February 19, 2012

An Open Letter to Cork City Hall

by Colm

To the Corporate Affairs team in Cork City Council:

I refer to the Mind, Body and Spirit exhibition that goes ahead twice a year in Cork City Hall.

Based on our visit to the show last March, a number of people purporting to be psychics and fortune tellers had stalls at the exhibition. The costs on display were significant, on the order of 40 to 50 euro a session.

As you are opening Cork City Hall to psychics on a regular basis, it is only fair to point out that many of these people may not be providing the services they purport to offer. Many psychics use a practice known as “cold reading”: a psychological technique where information is gleaned from the customer, and replayed back in a way that seems to indicate that the psychic has special powers. This technique simply exploits our normal human inability to absorb and recognise disconfirming information. Many magicians and mentalists use the same techniques, but they never claim psychic abilities. Not one psychic has ever been able to demonstrate their powers in a properly controlled trial, strongly indicating that these claimed abilities do not exist.

By opening the City Hall to psychics, please remember that you are exposing people, sometimes at a difficult time in their lives, to individuals who claim access to special wisdom. It is extremely unlikely that this special wisdom actually exists. In any case, the benefits are doubtful and the disadvantages may, in some cases, be serious. There are instances of customers listening to the advice of psychics instead of seeking proper medical or psychological treatment. Even looked at benignly, it may be an unwanted interference in the grieving process, offering people false hope when they are trying to come to terms with a loss. If even one “psychic” at the show is knowingly using trickery to exploit their customers, surely this is an issue of concern?

Other displays of highly dubious benefit were represented in the show in March, such as crystal healing, angel healers, and an organisation purporting to be a Human Rights organisation, when it is simply a front for the Church of Scientology.

As Cork City Hall is a public forum, we would have thought that you have a duty to hold exhibitions that provide useful services to the public and which do not prey on human vulnerability or gullibility. Is there a quality control process in place, in terms of who is allowed to exhibit, and what is permitted to be exhibited? If a group or organisation is advocating therapies or services that conflict with the best available evidence, is this of concern to you? If large sums of money are changing hands where the promised benefits are either totally unproven or proven not to work, is this something that you might wish to explore further?

People, of course, have a right to spend their money as they see fit. Our query is whether a public forum, such as the City Hall, is an appropriate venue for services that have highly dubious social value.

Best regards,

Colm Ryan
Cork Skeptics

Magician Paul Zenon describes how psychics perform their stage acts:

Magician James Randi spectacularly debunks faith healer Peter Popoff’s alleged powers.

What’s the Harm in believing in Psychics?

February 4, 2012

David Robert Grimes tackles bad journalism

by Colm

For our January meeting, David Robert Grimes gave us a comprehensive and entertaining talk on the misuse of statistics in the media. Starting with an explanation about how statistics can easily be distorted in the wrong hands (the maths bit), David talked about the reality behind cancer statistics and how testing for breast cancer at too early an age might actually be counter-productive. David also discussed problems with comparing relative statistics and misrepresenting small absolute changes in data as huge problems. He then considered the incursion of PR releases into journalism (“churnalism”) and false balance - the creation of artificial debates in an effort to create controversy where no scientific controversy exists. Examples of these are creationism vs evolution and climate change. David also hits on anti-vaccination and HIV denial. David finishes by suggesting what people can do to counter bias and error. It was a terrific talk, full of stories and examples.


[MP3]

David has a PhD in Medical Physics and is an accomplished actor and musician. His blog is Three Men Make a Tiger and he can be found on Twitter at @drg1985.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers